Monthly Archive for December, 2010

Is Vitamin D an Asthma Wonder Drug?

In the world of allergy and asthma, vitamin D is now a hot topic.  Many allergy specialists are wondering whether vitamin D might be used to help control asthma symptoms.  Our attention has turned to vitamin D because of mounting circumstantial evidence that links vitamin D insufficiency with poor asthma control.  The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) begun in 1991 first noted a possible link between asthma and vitamin D insufficiency in Westernized countries like Ireland, England, Australia, the United States, and New Zealand which have the highest prevalence of asthma.  Most citizens in these countries spend the majority of their days indoors and so are commonly vitamin D insufficient, as they don’t spend enough time outside in the sun, which promotes vitamin D production in the skin.  In fact, we obtain 80% of our vitamin D from our skin and ingest only a small portion from vitamin D-rich foods like cod liver oil, salmon, cereal, milk,  etc.  Indeed, vitamin D insufficiency, defined as a blood level less than 30, is rampant in these countries, even in the sun-soaked Australia.  One study reports that 48% of the US pediatric population is vitamin D insufficient.  But just because lots of Westernized countries have lots of asthma and vitamin D insufficient patients doesn’t mean the two are related.

Furthering the conspiracy theory that vitamin D might play a role in asthma, African Americans and obese patients are more commonly vitamin D insufficient . . . and both groups are also more likely to have asthma.  And now we’re learning that vitamin D doesn’t just help control our blood calcium levels, which help keep our bones strong and prevent disease like ricketts.  We are beginning to understand that vitamin D does more than just help our intestines and kidneys absorb calcium.  Vitamin D receptors have also been found in the lung and in several immune cell lines like B-cells, T-cells, and dendritic cells.  What might vitamin D do in our immune system or . . . in our lungs?

One study in pregnant women revealed that vitamin D supplementation reduced the chance their future babies would develop asthma by as much as 40%.  The study had been prompted by the view that vitamin D might play a role in the development of the immune system and lungs in utero.  This significant finding has not been reliably reproduced however in subsequent studies.

At this point we don’t fully understand how vitamin D might function in our lungs or immune system, but we do think that vitamin D increases production of another type of immune cell called T regulatory cells or Tregs.  These cells tamp down immune responses.  So we might imagine that a lack of vitamin D and a resultant lack of Tregs might let the immune system run amok, as we see in various autoimmune diseases like diabetes or multiple sclerosis or inflammatory bowel disease or asthma . . .all of which have been associated with vitamin D insufficiency.  Again, these associations haven’t been proved to be causal at this point, but the vitamin D story certainly is tantalizing.  What more obvious explanation for the increased asthma prevalence in African American patients when compared to Caucasians than color of the skin and its ability to make vitamin D.

In the lung, vitamin D has been shown to increase production of proteins that help fight infections.   This might explain why asthma patients experience more severe lung symptoms when they acquire common, upper respiratory, viral infections.  A re-analysis of a landmark asthma study called the Childhood Asthma Management Program study (CAMP), indeed supports this view that vitamin D insufficient patients are more likely to experience severe, life-threatening asthma exacerbations.   A more rigorous, randomized, controlled study evaluating the effect of supplementing asthma patients with vitamin D has not yet been done so we don’t yet have our definitive answer regarding vitamin D’s effect on asthma.  Maybe sicker asthma patients spend more time indoors and so, by force, have lower vitamin D levels and all of the above is just coincidence.  We’ll find out soon enough.

Hooray for the New Food Allergy Guidelines!!!

This week a mother and her 5 year-old son visited me for an opinion on his food allergies. She brought with her a 20 page colorful and flashy printout of labs done a few weeks ago. The testing was quite comprehensive in evaluating antibody response to over 100 foods and 30 environmental allergens. It checked for the presence of other antibodies indicating possible celiac disease and also measured total antibody levels of various types. Many foods were identified as positives and most of them were her son’s favorites. She was in despair as she sought to provide him excellent nutrition, deal with his frustration at being denied some of his beloved foods, and try to make sense of the advice she was given by the nurse at the pediatric office. She had been simply told not to give him any of these foods until she could make an appointment with the allergist.
I asked her why the tests had been run. She stated that her son had had mild to moderate eczema for several years and recently had over a week of hives that led to the test being done. She had no idea he was so allergic to so many foods.
As I reviewed the tests with her it became clear to me that all of the positive tests were of the IgG4 type. These tests are not approved for the detection of allergic response by the body. The serum IgE tests were negative to all foods. Some of the environmental IgE tests were positive such as dust mite and cat dander. The celiac tests were negative as well. I was troubled at the use of testing methods that were not approved for allergy evaluation. I was also troubled by the misuse of such tests to alter diet and lifestyle unnecessarily. No testing was indicated at all by the history and therefore the financial cost and family turmoil could have been avoided.
The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) released the first ever Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Food Allergy last week (http://www.niaid.nih.gov/topics/foodallergy/clinical/Pages/default.aspx). The intent of the guideline is to assist clinicians in properly diagnosing and managing food allergy. The recommendations are based on studies and expert opinion both. They address both recommended and controversial methods of testing for allergy. It addresses dietary advice for both the allergy sufferer and family members. It addresses proper emergency management techniques and medications. Finally the guideline recommends that patients with suspected food allergy see a specialist who can look at all the facets of the problem: the history, the exam, and the testing results. Food challenges can sometimes also be helpful in understanding the relevance of skin or specific IgE blood testing. In early 2011 the NIAID will release a lay person version of the food allergy guidelines. We will post the link here when it is available.

After our lengthy conversation about the facts of food allergy and testing mother and son were excited to have his favorite foods restored to him. After reviewing the facts surrounding his rash we decided that his outbreak of hives was likely due to a cold virus he suffered around the same time. She called the office today to report that he is doing well, eating all his favorite foods, and enjoying being a normal boy again.